top of page
Search

Monitoring pH and Nutrients in Bioprocesses

Updated: 2 days ago

A Practical Guide to Stable Growth, High Yield, and Process Control

Introduction

Monitoring pH and nutrients in bioprocesses is fundamental to achieving stable cell growth, consistent product quality, and high process efficiency. Whether you are running microbial fermentation, mammalian cell culture, or microalgae cultivation, small deviations in pH or nutrient availability can quickly cascade into reduced yields, unwanted byproducts, or even batch failure.

This guide explains how pH and nutrient monitoring works in bioprocessing, which measurement technologies are commonly used, and how modern real-time monitoring approaches are changing the way bioprocesses are controlled.


Why pH Monitoring Is Critical in Bioprocessing

pH directly affects:

  1. Enzyme activity and metabolic pathways

  2. Nutrient uptake and transport

  3. Cell growth rate and morphology

  4. Product formation and stability

  5. Contamination risk

In most bioprocesses, pH is not static. It continuously shifts due to:

  1. Substrate consumption

  2. Byproduct formation (e.g., organic acids, ammonia)

  3. CO₂ accumulation or stripping

  4. Changes in aeration and agitation

Without reliable in-line pH monitoring, these changes often go unnoticed until productivity drops.

Common pH Monitoring Technologies

  1. In-line pH probes (glass electrodes) are the industry standard for stirred-tank bioreactors

  2. ISFET pH sensors are more robust in harsh or high-pressure environments

  3. Optical pH sensors widely used in single-use and disposable bioreactors

pH Control Strategies

  1. Automated acid/base addition

  2. CO₂ or bicarbonate-based control

  3. Buffer systems (limited flexibility at scale)


Nutrient Monitoring in Bioprocesses: Why It’s More Challenging

While pH is relatively straightforward to measure continuously, nutrient monitoring in bioprocessing is significantly more complex.

“Nutrients” may include:

  • Carbon sources (glucose, glycerol, acetate, methanol)

  • Nitrogen sources (ammonia, nitrate, urea)

  • Phosphate

  • Trace elements and micronutrients

Each nutrient influences metabolism differently, and depletion or overfeeding can both harm the process.


Methods for Nutrient Monitoring in Bioprocesses

1) Off-Line and At-Line Nutrient Analysis

Most common approach in production today:

  • HPLC / UPLC for sugars and organic acids

  • Enzymatic analyzers for glucose, lactate, ammonia

  • Ion chromatography for nitrate and phosphate

Limitations:

  • Delayed feedback

  • Manual sampling effort

  • Risk of contamination

  • Limited suitability for real-time control


2) In-Line and On-Line Nutrient Monitoring (PAT)

Increasingly used in advanced facilities (PAT tools):

  • Raman spectroscopy for glucose, lactate, and amino acids

  • NIR / MIR spectroscopy for broader compositional insights

Enables real-time monitoring, but typically requires:

  • Robust calibration models

  • Frequent validation

  • Skilled data interpretation


3) Soft Sensors and Inferential Models

What they do: estimate nutrient levels indirectly (model-based) using signals like:

  • Oxygen uptake rate (OUR)

  • Carbon dioxide evolution rate (CER)

  • Base addition rates

  • Dissolved oxygen trends


Integrating pH and Nutrient Monitoring Into Control Strategies

Batch Bioprocesses

  1. pH is actively controlled

  2. Nutrients are monitored primarily for diagnostics

  3. Risk of late-stage nutrient depletion

Fed-Batch Bioprocesses

The most common industrial setup:

  1. Continuous pH control

  2. Substrate maintained at low, non-inhibitory levels

  3. Feed strategies based on time, DO-stat, or nutrient feedback

Continuous and Perfusion Processes

  • Tight control of pH and nutrients at steady state

  • High dependence on reliable in-line or real-time monitoring

  • Greater demand for automated analytics and digital twins

Common Problems Caused by Poor pH and Nutrient Monitoring

  • Undetected pH drift due to sensor fouling or calibration errors

  • Overfeeding leading to byproduct formation (e.g., acetate, lactate)

  • Nutrient starvation triggering stress responses

  • Inhomogeneous conditions in large-scale reactors

  • Excessive manual sampling increasing contamination risk

The Shift Toward Real-Time, In-Line Bioprocess Monitoring

Modern bioprocessing is moving away from reactive, sample-based monitoring toward continuous, real-time insight. In-line technologies reduce the need for manual sampling and enable faster, more informed control decisions.

Emerging approaches focus on:

  • Label-free measurement

  • High-frequency data capture

  • Automated trend detection

  • Early-warning signals for process deviations

These capabilities are particularly valuable for scaling up processes and ensuring batch-to-batch consistency.

Key Takeaways

  • pH monitoring in bioprocesses is essential and should always be in-line and automated

  • Nutrient monitoring is more complex but critical for yield and consistency

  • Combining sensors, spectroscopy, and soft sensors delivers the most robust control

  • Real-time monitoring reduces risk, improves efficiency, and supports scale-up

 
 
 

Comments

bottom of page